This blog discusses sexism women face in sports, growing up, education, and their careers. It covers the inequality in job salary and many other issues within daily life.

Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Women Scientist



Women Scientists
The Women’s Movement first began in America in the late eighteenth century, since then women have constantly had to fight a battle for basic rights such as voting, working, and even receiving an education. While women have overcome numerous obstacles to obtain equal rights, are women truly equal? Although women have come a long way since the eighteenth century, recent studies have shown that women still face discrimination in the sciences.  In particular, professors view women as inferior to men in the sciences, women have greater difficulty gaining employment in the sciences, and when hired are paid less than their male counterparts.
Growing up I never felt that science was a male dominated field. However now looking back I had more female teachers than male, but I never realized that all of my science teachers had been male. Therefore it should not have surprised me on my orientation day at Californian State University Northridge (CSUN) I had chosen electrical engineering as a major after strong encouragement from my father, who is an engineer himself. But, my father had forgotten to warn me that males largely dominated the sciences, particularly engineering. When I walked into orientation I immediately realized I was surrounded by men, there were only fabout 15 other females in the room. I was shocked. Interestingly, my friend who is studying computer science at CSUN told me a similar story. When she walked into her orientation she was overwhelmed by how many more males there were than females.  
After doing research on the topic, I stumbled upon information about the graduating Electrical Engineering majors at CSUN in 2009-2010. There were 101 graduating males while there were only 17 females in the graduating class (Match College). Moreover, in a recent study the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences conducted both male and female professors were found to be biased against females studying the sciences. The study surveyed 127 professors, asking them to rate the students according to their capability on a scale out of 1 to 5, with 5 being the best. The male professors rated the male students with an average rating of 4.01 and the female students with an average rating of 3.33. The female professors then rated the male students with an average rating of 4.10 and the female students with an average rating of 3.32 (Jaschik). The most surprising fact about this study was that the female professors were just as biased as the male professors.
 Even after graduating with an Engineering degree, women still face discrimination when trying to find employment. Peter Hicks, a member of the Institution of Engineering and Technology, states “in my 40 years of teaching electrical engineering at Manchester University women never made up more than 5% of my classes.”  Furthermore, the number of female students enrolled in the sciences has been steadily decreasing, five years ago, women made up 24% of computer science classes, now they make up just 19% (Davis). These startling new studies prove that this problem is only becoming worse. In my opinion this problem is deep-rooted, starting from elementary school. There are very few teachers in elementary school with a science related background (Hess). This needs to change so children can grow up with a more of an extensive knowledge in the sciences.
Besides the fact that according to new studies that professors are biased against female science students in universities, female scientists have continued to battle sexism in their careers by earning significantly less than male scientists. The same study that surveyed 127 professors asking about male and female student capabilities also asked the professors how much they believed the students should be paid after graduating. The male professors assumed the male students would be paid $30,520, Whereas the females would be paid $27,111. The female professors believed the male students would be paid $29,333 and the females $25,000 (Jachik). These discriminating attitudes lead to unequal opportunities amongst male and females, which may be offered from the university (Jaschik). In fact, aside from professors speculating that women scientist get paid less than their male counterparts, according to recent studies conducted by The Glassdoor, a website that estimates the pay of various careers, it is a fact. Female engineers earned 96.7% of their male counterparts early in their careers, and as the experience increases so does the gap in their salaries. Thus, four-six years of experience females earned 91.4%, in seven-nine years females earned 92.7% of what men earned, and then after ten-plus years, women earned 89.1% of what men earned (Besse). These biases resulted with women being paid less than men even though they are equally capable.
The issue of stereotyping is extremely important to resolve because when females look at these studies and realize they will be paid less than men, even though they may be equally capable, it will make them reconsider their career and steer more towards the careers viewed “traditionally” for women. To solve this issue it is important to continue to urge women to study the sciences and even out the ratio of men-to-women changing the attitudes of professors and employers so that they realize that women are just as capable as men. In order to foster more women more in the science fields Amanda Hess, author of the articleHow to Fix the Bias against Women in Science? Think Big”, interviewed sixth grade science teacher Janelle Wilson, who suggests encouraging “schools to engage boys and girls in science, technology, engineering, and mathematic (STEM) subjects early, before biases set in (Hess). Although this solution is helpful it will not be able to solve the bigger problem. Author ofNumbers of Women in Engineering, Physics and Computer Science are on the Decline” Emma Knott, states that this problem is not so simple to solve. After observing countries where there are a slightly higher percentage of female scientists, researchers found that women have more political power in those countries revealing that that the two issues are intertwined. Furthermore, the countries where there are more women scientists have “government policies that support childcare, equal pay, and gender mainstreaming” (Knott). After seeing these studies, it is evident that the solution to this problem is targeting government policies and having the government directly encourage females to pursue a science degree.
Even though women have indeed come a long way since the eighteenth century, it is important to realize women are still not treated equally to men. There are still stereotypes that women cannot prosper in the harder subjects, such as, mathematics and sciences. When attempting to master the sciences women are faced with extreme challenges along the way causing them to avoid these subjects for their own good. But when looking for a solution to this issue it is important realize it is a lot broader than it seems. Having more women scientists directly ties in with governmental policies, the more equality government policies push, the more powerful women there will be. 

By Heba 





Work Cited
Besse, Tim. "Engineering Pay Gap? Glassdoor Reveals Many Women Engineers Earn Less than Men." Glassdoor. N.p., 10 Mar. 2009. Web. 24 Oct. 2012. <http://www.glassdoor.com/blog/engineering-pay-gap-glassdoor-reveals-many-women-engineers-earn-less-than-men/>.
Jaschik, Scott. "Study Offers New Evidence That Scientists Are Biased against Women | Inside Higher Ed." Study Offers New Evidence That Scientists Are Biased against Women | Inside Higher Ed. Inside High Ed, 21 Sept. 2012. Web. 24 Oct. 2012. <http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/09/21/study-offers-new-evidence-scientists-are-biased-against-women>.
Knott, Emma. "New Gender Benchmarking Study Finds Numbers of Women in Science and Technology Fields Alarmingly Low." New Gender Benchmarking Study Finds Numbers of Women in Science and Technology Fields Alarmingly Low. N.p., 3 Oct. 2012. Web. 24 Oct. 2012. <http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2012-10/e-ngb100312.php>.
Hass, Amanda. "How to Fix the Bias Against Women in Science? Think Big." The XX Factor. Slate, 4 Oct. 2012. Web. 24 Oct. 2012. <http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2012/10/04/women_in_science_fixing_the_bias_requires_broad_social_change_.html>.

Female Enrollment in Engineering Programs

This picture shows the difference in women enrolled in engineering programs in 2009 compared to men.  While the previous post illustrated the employment gap between female and male engineers, this picture gives an insight into why there is such a wide gap in employment, because there are few women engineers to begin with.

Orvis, Jacques. "Spartan Daily." Spartan Daily. N.p., 28 Nov. 2012. Web. 04 Dec. 2012. <http://spartandaily.com/92297/against-the-odds-sjsu-women-excel-in-engineering>.

Monday, December 3, 2012

Females Struggle in the Professional Athletic World


Joey Ponce
4 December 2012
Females Struggle in the Professional Athletic World
            When you think of a professional athlete what is the first name that comes to mind?  The majority of us immediately jump to the idea of a male athlete without any hesitation at all.  Why do almost all of us not even take a second to think of a female athlete?  These women train just as hard and dedicate the same amount of time to their sport as men do but are overlooked by many people.  Professional female athletes suffer more than male athletes do because they do not receive the money they deserve.  According to ‘The Women’s Sports Foundation’, “Total prize money for the PGA tour, $256 million, is more than five times that of the LPGA tour, $50 million. Similar discrepancies exist throughout professional sports”(The Women Sports Foundation).  That is a 200 million dollar difference between men and women professional golfers.  There is an inequality amongst male and female athletes derived from societies perception of both genders with respect to athletics.  Professional female athletes do not get high paying endorsement deals and contracts, some are seen as sex symbols rather than as athletes, and most importantly they do not receive the notoriety and respect when compared to professional male athletes.
            Professional female athletes are severely underpaid when compared to professional male athletes of any major sport.  In 2012 the WNBA minimum contract for an athlete was $35,000 meanwhile the maximum contract was still only $101,000. Yes, that is the maximum amount a female WNBA player can make in one season.  On the other hand the minimum NBA contract is currently $473,000 while the highest paid player in the NBA is making an overwhelming $28,000,000.  The lowest paid player in the NBA makes four times more money than the highest paid professional female basketball player.  Does that seem fair to you?  I understand that male athletes have sold more seats and drawn higher ratings on television in the past but a gap that large in my opinion is absurd.  For example, the highest paid female athlete in 2012 was Maria Sharipova who brought in 25 million dollars, the majority coming from endorsement deals.  In contrast the highest paid male athlete of 2012 was Floyd Mayweather Jr who made 85 million dollars none of which from an endorsement deal.  Countless professional male athletes bring in more money off endorsement deals in one year than a large majority of female athletes will make in an entire career. 
            Unfortunately for women many professional athletes are seen as sex symbols, simply overlooking their marvelous talent.  Therefore we immediately think of male athletes when asked who comes to mind of professional athletes.  Some of these women are on ESPN and they have been on magazine covers and we know who they are but we overlook them as professionals in their craft.  Alex Morgan one of the best players on the US female women’s national soccer team is often recognized for her fashion spreads as opposed to her extraordinary talent.  This has happened to more than a few female athletes.  They gain their notoriety for looks and posing in revealing magazines to bring more attention to themselves and to their sport.  A quote from a book review on The Stronger Women Get, The More Men Love Football: Sexism and the American Culture of Sports states, “There is something about male sports privilege that contributes to the sexual objectification and abuse of women” (Nathan 11). This book is written to raise the awareness of how women are seen as objects when it comes down to sports.  At times they are not even being seen as athletes.  The truth of the matter is that we are all to blame for the way these female athletes are treated and depicted.  We let the media put these images out that depict these professional athletes as sex symbols without recognizing them for their talents and accomplishments.
            Consequently females have been disadvantaged in sports from an early age.  They do not receive the same recognition in competitive sports as boys.  For the most part large majorities of the time people do not take female athletes serious.  Although some of these disadvantages for female athletes have gone away in past years there is still discrimination amongst athletes.  Even at the tender ages of 10 to 12 years old we can see discrimination between these two genders.  At 10 to 12 years old Little League Baseball is nationally televised on ESPN to recognize the talented young boys who have achieved the feat of making it to that stage.  In contrast there is not a Little League Softball World Series for girls in that same age group.  Female athletes go their whole athletic career not receiving the same recognition as male athletes. 
The media is the main reason to blame for the unfair representation of female athletes.  An article on Women’s Olympic Beach Volleyball covered the way the media represented these athletes and did not promote them as athletes but rather as sex symbols.  As a result it marginalizes female athletes ability because it is not what they are being recognized for.  During the 2012 Olympics one of the most popular sports was in fact Beach Volleyball.  Beach Volleyball is composed of women who wear bikinis during their matches.  Would Beach Volleyball be as important if they were not wearing such revealing clothes?  I think a large portion of their fan base is attracted to the fact they are only in bikinis.  Whenever these women are portrayed in the media they make sure they can have the athletes wearing the smallest bikinis possible so they can attract more attention to their sport.  Sure, now people are watching Beach Volleyball but it is for the wrong reason?  The media sometimes loses track and does not depict these women as athletes or in some cases they do not mention these females at all.  ESPN and its show ‘SportsCenter’ the main source for sports media, “Devoted only 1.4% of its airtime to coverage of women's sports, a decline in their coverage of women's sports compared with 1999 (2.2%) and 2004 (2.1%)” (Sports Page Coverage 2010).  With the main sports news outlet only devoting 1.4% of airtime to female athletes it is impossible for them to gain the same recognition as the men do. 
Women have made significant strides to try and remove the sex symbol label that has been placed upon them but are seen having to promote their bodies so they can receive the recognition and money they deserve.  Female athletes do not make their money off of their actual salary.  It is made from sponsorships and being in TV ad and in magazines.  In the end female athletes have almost no choice but to promote themselves to try and bring fans and supporters to their sport.  Women sports have failed in the past in the United States because they did not have a steady and reliable fan base.  So by posing in these revealing magazines and showing off their body they are becoming known as a sex symbol and people are not respecting their God given talents as a professional athlete.  Even though it will be tough financially women need to begin to steer away from that approach so they are not given the sex symbol label and so they can actually be respected for their talents.
            Hopefully in the future we will begin to see equality amongst male and female athletes.  To start we need to change societies perception of female athletes.  The media needs to promote these women as athletes and not as models.  Sports media stations like ESPN will have to dedicate more than a pitiful 1.4% of airtime to female athletes if there will be any improvement at all.  As fans and supporters of athletes people must begin to appreciate and give credit and respect to these females for all their dedication and hard work.  Female athletes deserve equality amongst male athletes.  Showing support for female athletes is the first step you can do to make a difference in trying to bring equality amongst male and female athletes.  
           
        
Works Cited
French, Sean. "I Love The Olympics, Especially The Beach Volleyball, Played By Women In Tiny Two-Piece Suits." New Statesman 129.4506 (2000): 28. Academic Search Elite. Web. 25 Oct. 2012.
Nathan, Jennifer. "The Stronger Women Get, the More Men Love Football: Sexism and the American Culture of Sports -- Book Review." The OptiMSt Sep 30 1995: 11-. GenderWatch. Web. 25 Oct. 2012.
Pratt, Judith, et al. "Gender Differences in Print Media Coverage of the 2004 Summer Olympics in Athens, Greece." Women in Sport & Physical Activity Journal 17.2 (2008): 34-41. GenderWatch. Web. 25 Oct. 2012.
"Sports Page Coverage: Have We Made Some Progress?." NAGWS Gazette, (2010): 2. Web. 25 Oct. 2012
"Women's Sports Foundation." Women's Sports Foundation. N.p., n.d. Web. 25 Oct. 2012. 

Gender Roles in Sports Media Coverage

Gender Inequality in Adolescents


Gender Inequality in Adolescents
             Gender inequality is a growing issue despite the many advances in society today. Studies have proven this to be a learned behavior that can start as early as in preschool age children. For example, different colored blocks as well as different types of toys are chosen by a child in association with their gender and the specific behaviors they have learned to associate with that gender. When a female toddler goes to pick up a toy to play with they are more likely to pick up a doll over a fire truck, as seen in, “Pink or Blue: Environmental Gender Stereotypes in the First Two Years of Life,” a study on gender stereotyping, “Compared to boys, girls play more with dolls, doll accessories and soft toys” (Pomerleau, Boldu and Malcuit 360). Although all children are subject to gender bias, I believe that girls often have it worse off, due to the fact that girls are given no leeway when it comes to having interests in toys that are for the opposite sex because it is not what girls do. A gender biased society creates a more difficult environment for a child to live and grow in when the implementation of gender based stereotypes is introduced. This creates heightened levels of social anxiety in the child and establishes lasting impressions on the social viewpoints related to gender appropriateness.
              Gender inequality provides for a more strenuous environment for the child to grow and develop when stereotyping is being impressed upon them. The role of color association weighs heavily on a child’s decision as to what is appropriate for their gender from their first day of life, the hospital will usually associate pink blankets, clothing and accessories with female babies and blue with male babies. Typically teachers promote this idea by defining bathroom passes for each sex by making one blue and one pink, children are then expected to recognize the difference and learn which color is to be associated with their gender “…unknowingly reinforcing gender stereotypes” (Carl 2012). Girls, more often than boys, are separated by the activities they do on the playground because it appeals to the opposite sex. Parents and teachers alike try to accommodate both girls’ interests as well as boys’ interests by creating activities that appeal to one sex or the other, but hardly to both. Although this is seen as considerate to the interests of both genders, teachers “… are really teaching the children to ‘do’ gender” (Carl 2012) furthering the stereotypes that are going to be carried with them throughout the rest of their lives. Girls are associating the activities they are doing by gender and their views of what a female would be interested in, versus what would appeal to a male; therefore they are often discouraged by the biases created. Children are being taught to judge one another based off of a biological makeup, resulting in a developing stereotypical mindset.
           Growing up in a gender biased society not only teaches stereotypes at a young age but creates social anxiety and fear. Commonly, girls tend to feel “less than” compared to boys due to the fact that boys are often permitted by their parents to do more because of their gender based strength. Studies on gender stereotyping exemplified that “…other adults judged it more natural for young girls to play with dolls and soft toys…For boys, it was judged more appropriate to display aggressive behaviors, rough-and-tumble play…and to fall and hurt themselves” (Pomerleau, Boldu and Malcuit 360).  The root of social anxiety begins in children at the primary level and is unknowingly communicated from not only their teachers, but parents as well. Parents, who often times were brought up the same way, argue that “…little boys and little girls are two different species—boys aggressive and girls sweet” (Carl 2012). Consequently, children begin to formulate anxiety and fear that they are not going to fit in with the social norm that is created by parents, teachers and peers.  Commonly, parents and other adults will create an environment which will “…encourage sex-typed play by selecting different toys for female and male children, even before the child can express her or his own preferences” inhibiting the child’s ability for full discovery of what interests them (Pomerleau, Boldu and Malcuit 365). Through experiencing the gender biased activities and learning how color is associated with sex, girls who think differently than what is correct for their gender often question who they are and their own personal interests; resulting in a loss of identity and an increasing fear. Subsequently, it is crucial for children to grow up away from gender stereotypes because “Childhood is the prime time for development of gender identity” (Carl 2012). Girls who are beginning to discover the meaning of femininity should not be discouraged when interested in something for the opposite sex; they should be encouraged to find personal identity. Those children who are limited prove to be the ones suffering from social anxiety rooting from gender bias they have once experienced.
            Progressing in an unequal society creates social anxiety as well as establishes a lasting impression on social viewpoints of gender appropriateness. While girls are supposed to be treated as dainty, delicate and something to be cherished; boys are viewed as masculine, strong and taught to be gentlemen. This way of thinking is influenced by the early exposure to gender appropriate toys providing that, “Infants who are encouraged and reinforced to play with dolls and child’s furniture, or sports equipment and tools will be more likely to choose these objects when they are given a choice. They have also learned that these objects are appropriate for them, and for children of their own gender” (Pomerleau, Boldu and Malcuit 366)  Societal norms are centered on gender, thus influencing girls and their position in society. Girls are encouraged to strive for feminine jobs such as teaching or nursing because those jobs are gender appropriate. Typically, “…these aspirations reflect society’s stereotypic standards of gender appropriate roles; that is, boys selected such primarily adventurous, traditionally “masculine” jobs as policeman, scientist, cowboy, or sports superstar; while girls chose nurturing, traditionally “feminine” ambitions such as teacher or nurse” (Garrett, Ein and Tremaine 507) Hardly ever do you hear of a little girl answer the question, “What do you want to be when you grow up?” with “ A fireman,” due to the fact that girls are being taught what is appropriate for them to do when fantasizing about their future through discussion at school and at home. As a result it is becoming increasingly evident that “Children learn what behavior is ‘appropriate’ for each gender and how to fit in with others who are like us” (Carl 2012). Although at the primary level it is trivial, as girls grow up, it becomes a larger issue and the ideal type of female becomes acted upon. Seeing that gender inequality creates social standards for what is normal, it is important that children are encouraged to follow what is acceptable based off of their own interests, not what is acceptable for their biological make up.
             The social environment in which children are growing up is based off of gender bias which in turn is seen through stereotypes that many young girls are confronted with. Consequently, social anxiety and fear is created in schools and lasting ideas of what is gender appropriate is established. This will continue at the primary level as long as girls and boys are taught gender differences through color and different types of toys. Although it lessens as the level of education advances, it is embedded within the child’s mental development, thus shaping how they view gender differences for the rest of their lives.
Works Cited

Carl, John. “What’s the Difference?” Editorial. Montessori Life 2012: 26-31. Web.

Garrett, C. S., P. L. Ein, and L. Tremaine. "The Development of Gender Stereotyping of Adult Occupations in Elementary School Children." Child Development 48.2 (1977): 507. Print.

Pomerleau, Andre, Daniel Bolduc, Gerard Malcuit, and Louise Cossette. "Pink or Blue: Environmental Gender Stereotypes in the First Two Years of Life." Sex Roles 22.5-6 (1990): 359-67. Print.

 

Sunday, December 2, 2012

Employed Engineers by Gender

This graph outlines the number of women engineers hired compared to male engineers over the span of  eighteen years. It is very clear from looking at this graph that the employment of engineers has not changed much over time, but it is more important to notice that the employment gap between female and male engineers is constant. Which shows that women are still being discriminated against while looking for a career in engineering.

"Women in High-Tech Job." Women's Bureau. United States Department of Labor, July 2002. Web. 27 Nov. 2012. <http://www.dol.gov/wb/factsheets/hitech02.htm>.